陳雲是吃了藥還是忘了吃藥?

陳雲:「香港城邦自治是華夏復興與東亞解放的基礎,希望中共逐漸明白,美帝國才是香港與北京的共同敵人。為了對付美帝國和美帝國扶助的民主派和地產財閥,北京必須容許香港本土勢力成長起來,香港人必須保障自己的生存空間及獲得拓展機會,發揮一國兩制的微妙功效,將來協助建立中華邦聯。」

山中看了呆了兩分鐘,下巴掉在桌上久久不能合攏。爲什麽美國突然是香港與北京的「共同敵人」??我們不是一直説反共的嗎?何以陳雲突然要跟共產黨對付美國?香港的「地產財閥」由美國扶助?陳雲吃了什麽迷幻藥,可不可以分我一點?

「北京必須容許香港本土勢力成長起來」,我終於明白陳雲的意思了,原來他要「勇武抗爭」成立「新土共」,而且這股「土」力量要比土共更土,土得連自己在說什麽都不知道。

「香港人…獲得拓展機會」加上「東亞解放的基礎」,陳雲想由香港主辦「大東亞共榮圈」?香港短短十幾年内由殖民地演變到「東亞解放」的主要舞臺,以本土為本位往外拓展到東亞去,去建立香港的殖民地,「勇武抗爭」真的是神妙難當,「大香港共榮圈」萬歲!

全香港的精神病院應立刻檢查一下,看看是否和走失了一位病人。

This entry was posted in Awesome Stuff and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 則回應給 陳雲是吃了藥還是忘了吃藥?

  1. Bill 說:

    山中,

    陳雲吃了迷药,忘記了中共這共產黨只是個管治集團的名字,它除了不扶助民主外,甚麼都扶助,地產財閥都是自己人,它的敵人就是窮人。當大部份人都有問題時,走失了的是正常人。你不是走失了去加拿大嗎?

    • 山中 說:

      一個神志有問題的人居然這麽多支持者,不知這是否才算是「正常」?史記屈原列傳有漁父曰:「夫聖人者,不凝滯於物而能與世推移。舉世混濁,何不隨其流而揚其波?眾人皆醉,何不餔其糟而啜其醨?」

  2. mrtso1989 說:

    Frankly, I used to find his ideas greatly attractive. But the more I read what he writes, the more I find him ‘walking in the air’.

    • 山中 說:

      I’m intrigued. I have not read his book and not planning to. Can you tell me what ideas of his are worthy discussing?

      • mrtso1989 說:

        My friend, learned in Chinese, highly recommends me his books on Chinese language, like 中文解毒, and also on Chinese custom, which is after all an area within his specialty.
        Going beyond cultural studies, what he said in politics is controversial because we don’t really know he is saying bullshit or prophecies which are not much different to me. But in any case, his 港城邦論 at first seems, to me, offers some interesting idea about Hong Kong as a city state like the ancient Venice. However you will certainly laugh at what he said about economics. He cited several news reports from Ming Pao or other newspaper and then predict that China is going through ‘Latinisation’ in South America. He hasn’t done any serious research and neither did he cite any convincing scholars’ views to support his theory.

        • 山中 說:

          I cannot comment on his books, because I have not read them (and not going to waste my time). Venice had a very powerful navy. It had colonies and arable lands beyond the city proper (yes, the “state of Venice" is never just “Venice"); it controlled the spices trade before the Ottoman Empire blocking it off. It sacked Constantinople during the 4th crusade. Hell, it was the major member in the anti-Ottoman Holy League. Machiavelli believed it could have united Italy if it had placed more effort on building an army. Basically, it was a proto-British Empire of its days. I don’t see how Hong Kong can be compared to Venice. I highly recommend 《海都物語》by 鹽野七生 to those who want to learn more about Venice.

          What does he mean by ‘Latinisation’? China is fully aware of Latin America’s development problem and went out of its way to prevent that from happening. Latin America before the 80s followed what economists called import substitute industrialization (ISI). It worked very well, but failed after some time because of deteriorating terms of trade. After that, they went with Washington Consensus. East Asian countries, including China, followed outward oriented policy, which is basically import substitute plus a lot of exports.

發表迴響

在下方填入你的資料或按右方圖示以社群網站登入:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / 變更 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / 變更 )

Facebook照片

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / 變更 )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / 變更 )

連結到 %s